|
||
|
|
|
|||| United
Nations Coordination of the International Humanitarian Response to the Gulf
Crisis 1990-1992 |
|
| read (html) | order info | reviews: [Plain] [UNHCR] [Cain] [Hannay] | |
| INFO |
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
|
| The Gulf Crisis volume, the first formal case study carried out by the Humanitarianism and War Project, offers a definition of coordination that has served as a conceptual foundation for the Project's work: "the systematic utilization of policy instruments to deliver humanitarian assistance in a cohesive and effective manner." (3) Six such instruments are identified: strategic planning, gathering data and managing information, mobilizing resources and ensuring accountability, orchestrating an operational division of labor, negotiating with host political authorities, and exercising leadership. | |
| The study concludes that the UN failed to coordinate humanitarian activities in the Gulf crisis effectively due to problems both within and among the organizations and between them and the political-military side of the UN house. A number of problems identified, however, were not of the UN's own making. The study recommends designation of a single UN individual in a given country or region to ensure effective coordination and accountability. UN officials credited the subsequent creation of the Department of Humanitarian Affairs in part to the identification of weaknesses in coordination in this study. Other recommendations, both humanitarian and political in thrust, were directed to specific actors: the UN, governments, NGOs, and the international community. | |
|
The five-person research team interviewed more than 200 actors in the Gulf crisis during the period April-June 1990, including visits to Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Syria, and Turkey as well as to UN and agency headquarters and donor capitals. For comments by a UK ambassador to the UN, a UN official, and a journal reviewer, see Section 8, Selected Reviews of Project Publications.
|
|
| KEYWORDS |
|
|
humanitarian principles, humanitarian access, human rights, politicization, sovereignty, enforcement, warfare, economic sanctions, coordination, bilateralism, civil society, conflict resolution, peace, accountability; Iraq, Kuwait, Jordan, Turkey, Iran, U.S., U.K., Operation Provide Comfort; UN, UN Security Council, DPA, DPKO, UNDRO, DHA, UNICEF, UNHCR, WFP, UNDP, WHO, IOM, UNEP, UNIFEM, UNRWA, NGOs, the Red Cross Movement.
|
|
| REVIEW
AND COMMENTS |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
-brown university | the
watson institute - -Tufts University | Feinstein International Famine Center - |
||||
|
|