| |
||||
Status
Report #23: September 10, 1996.
|
 |
THIS
IS ANOTHER
in our series of reports designed to keep the stakeholders of the Humanitarianism
and War Project and its increasingly wide circle of users current on our
work. This report covers the period since May 10 1996.
|
| |
|
 |
CONTENTS:
|
| |
Research
Activities
Dissemination
Evaluation
Other
Items
|
| |
|
 |
RESEARCH
ACTIVITIES
|
| |
Work is proceeding
on a number of case studies. Our monograph Haiti Held Hostage: International
Responses to the Quest for Nationhood 1986-1996 will be published later
this month in the Watson Institute Occasional Paper series. Our report
War and Humanitarian Action in Chechnya is expected to be available in
printed form late in October. Representing the first detailed analysis
of the constraints on humanitarian activities provided by the political,
historical, and cultural context, this publication by consultants Greg
Hansen and Robert Seely should be both timely and ground-breaking. Our
study by S. Neil MacFarlane and Larry Minear, Humanitarian Action and
Politics: The Conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, should be in your hand by
year's end. In each of instance, the full text will be placed on our web
site several weeks in advance of the circulation of the printed Occasional
Paper. We encourage you to download your own copy.
|
| |
Our
study in collaboration with the Fourth Freedom Forum of Indiana and the
Kroc Institute of International Peace Studies at the University of Notre
Dame of the humanitarian and political impacts of multilateral economic
sanctions is proceeding. A manuscript reflecting work carried out to date,
Political Gain and Civilian Pain: The Humanitarian Impact of Economic
Sanctions, is being readied for the publisher. In addition to reviews
of the impacts of sanctions in Iraq, former Yugoslavia, Haiti, and South
Africa, the text contains methodological comments and tentative conclusions.
The next phase of the research involves discussions with UN organizations
and NGOs regarding their experiences with sanctions, beginning later this
month in New York, Rome, Bonn, and Geneva. To date, funds for the sanctions
work have been received from the UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs,
UNICEF, UNDP, and WFP. A progress report is expected next spring, a final
report next fall. The terms of reference of the research are attached.
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
DISSEMINATION
|
| |
Reflecting
the Project's commitment to the fullest possible use of its work by humanitarian
organizations, a number of meetings to disseminate the results have been
held and are planned. The Georgia case study was the subject of a debriefing
by S. Neil MacFarlane and Larry Minear in Tblisi in May, attended by UN
officials, NGOs, and government officials, followed by a press briefing.
To bring the findings and recommendations of the Haiti study before policy-makers
and practitioners, debriefings are planned for October 17 in Washington,
sponsored by the Georgetown University Haiti Program in collaboration with
the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and at the Haitian embassy.
On October 23, debriefings will be held at the United Nations in New York
for diplomats, secretariat staff, and NGOs. |
| |
In recent months
writings associated with the Project have appeared in a number of newspapers
and journals. "The Nagorno-Karabakh Time Bomb," by S. Neil MacFarlane
and Larry Minear, appeared in the Providence Journal and on the Knight-Ridder
news service. Larry Minear's "The Humanitarian and Military Interface:
Reflections on the Rwanda Experience," will appear in a US journal later
this month.
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
EVALUATION
|
| |
The
evaluation of the Project noted in our last Status Report is nearing conclusion.
Consultant Giles Whitcomb, following productive discussions with a sample
of funders and users of our work, is preparing his findings and recommendations.
These will be reflected in our strategic planning for Phase 3 of the Project,
beginning in 1997. The next Status Report will contain a summary of his
report. We wish to thank those who have shared their views with him. |
| |
Also helpful in putting
our work into context is an extended review by William DeMars, formerly
at the University of Notre Dame, now at the American University in Cairo,
in the Mershon International Studies Review. Noting our international
focus and ownership, DeMars describes the Project as representing "the
most articulate voice of the U.S. humanitarian community." He credits
it with conveying "the human texture of humanitarian work" and with making
practical recommendations. He faults the Project for understating the
clashes of views within the humanitarian and human rights communities
and for isolating humanitarian principles from the political process.
While we might differ with DeMar's reading at various points, we are pleased
with the detailed review he has given our work and commend his article
to you.
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
OTHER
ITEMS
|
| |
The publication by
the OECD in English and French of Soldiers to the Rescue: Humanitarian
Lessons from Rwanda by Larry Minear, delayed during the summer, is now
scheduled for September 19 in Paris. The book's conclusions are summarized
in Minear's attached journal article.
|
| |
We are pleased to
welcome Margareta Levitsky to our ranks as staff assistant. Having begun
late last year on a temporary basis, she is now providing part-time administrative
and secretarial support for our activities.
|
| |
|